COAT4D: Conspicuous Consumption
I've encountered the term “conspicuous consumption” while reading an interview with Andy Rubin (who is employed by Google).
“Mr. Rubin readily acknowledges his obsession with consumer gadgets and even more expensive toys — an obsession that put him at odds with Google’s stated aversion to conspicuous consumption.
“The day before Google went public in 2004, Wayne Rosing, then the vice president for engineering, stood on a stage during a companywide meeting and brandished a baseball bat. He threatened to use it on anyone’s car in the Google parking lot that was anything flashier than a 3 Series BMW.
“As a result, Mr. Rubin had to buy a new car when he came to Google. (A souped-up German sports car that he recently acquired sits at home in his garage.) He acknowledges the discomfort created by the situation. “One of the things that Google’s really good at is not encouraging conspicuous consumption,” he says. “I’m a big fan of well-engineered things, and so I’m wrestling with how those two things can coexist.””
As defined in Wikipedia:
”Conspicuous consumption is a term used to describe the lavish spending on goods and services that are acquired mainly for the purpose of displaying income or wealth. In the mind of a conspicuous consumer, such display serves as a means of attaining or maintaining social status. A very similar but more colloquial term is 'keeping up with the Joneses'.”
As
much as I love the idea of *not* encouraging conspicuous consumption,
it's tricky where to draw the line because what's conspicuous for other
people might not be conspicuous to the one who's doing the consumption.
For example, I like to wear brand name jeans not because I
want to show them off but because in my experience, I'm more
comfortable wearing brand name jeans because they have better fit, they
are soft, they don't smudge, and they last longer. I'm willing to
switch to greener jeans but they're still mucho pricey for me. That's why I hang out at sale racks at Gap, The Limited and Banana Republic.
And if I can afford it, I'd really like to get a Lexus RX Hybrid
(I don't do minivans, so this makes for a good family car too). Again,
not for the intention of flaunting wealth, but because the Lexus brand
has top notch engineering, lots of high-end features and has excellent
customer service. This innocent preference might still be interpreted
by others as conspicuous. Good thing I don't have this problem at the
moment. I'm planning to ride my old car until it craps out on me.
My point is, it's all relative. However, there are indeed obvious signs when someone is spending lavishly to display their wealth – driving a Ferrari Enzo to work; wearing diamond blings on their teeth; private jet made of gold; spending hundreds of thousands on parties and flowers – and we can smell them from a mile away. I can't think of any justification for those except, “Hey, check out what I can afford!”
At
the extreme end of the spectrum are billionaires. It's hard to be
humble when you're a billionaire. The only high profile billionaire I
know who is humble enough not to display his worth is Warren Buffett.
Check out this article on Forbes.
“Things have changed. While today's superrich still like to live in large houses, surrounded with the best that money can buy, they are much more individualistic. Their houses are more likely to reflect their own tastes and interests rather than adhering to a grand, though impersonal, style.”
Very, very, conspicuous.
Then again, on second thought, buying mansions is more of an investment
than a consumption. These billionaires get a good return on their
investments in the long run. Gah, it's easier to make money the more
money you have.
Here's to conscious (not conspicuous) consumption.
November 6, 2007 at 08:11 PM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: On Suffering and Compassion
My daily quote from Glimpse @ Rigpa arrived a few hours early. And it's very relevant...
May 20
The times when you are suffering can be those when you are open, and where you are extremely vulnerable can be where your greatest strength really lies.
Say to yourself: “I am not going to run away from this suffering. I want to use it in the best and richest way I can, so that I can become more compassionate and more helpful to others.” Suffering, after all, can teach us about compassion. If you suffer, you will know how it is when others suffer. And if you are in a position to help others, it is through your suffering that you will find the understanding and compassion to do so.
May 19, 2007 at 09:02 PM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
COAT4D: Nietzsche on Chaos

"One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star" -- Friedrich Nietzsche
January 12, 2007 at 05:14 PM in COAT4D, Kosmic Aperture | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: Rumsfeld on Uncertainty
“Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don't know we don't know.”
– Donald Rumsfeld, Department of Defense news briefing, February 12, 2002
A Pensive Rumsfeld
Uploaded by Katie Falkenberg on 5 Oct '05, 9.24am PDT.
Godspeed Donald, godspeed….
November 9, 2006 at 09:06 AM in COAT4D, Politics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
COAT4D: Love is the Teacher
Today's COAT for the day is a photo I took while waiting at O'Hare airport. Very fluffy.
November 3, 2006 at 11:11 AM in COAT4D, Kosmic Aperture, ~Reticulum Rex | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: On Laws of Technology
Kranzberg’s First Law helps to clarify this situation: Technology is neither good nor bad—nor is it neutral. At the risk of spoiling its Zenlike nature, let me propose an interpretation: a technology isn’t inherently good or bad, but it will have an impact, which is why it’s not neutral. Almost every applied technology has a good side and a bad side. When you think of transportation technologies, do you think of how they enable a delightful vacation or get the family back together during the holidays—or do you think of traffic jams and pollution? Are books a source of wisdom and spirituality or a way to distribute pornography and hate? Do you applaud medical technology for curing plagues or deplore transportation technology for spreading them? Does encrypted e-mail keep honest people safe from criminals or criminals safe from the police? Are plastics durable conveniences or everlasting pollutants? Counterfeiting comes with money, obscene phone calls come with the telephone, spam comes with e-mail, and pornography comes with the Internet. Every law creates an outlaw.
Source: Future Hype: The Myths of Technology Change, Page: 10
September 5, 2006 at 03:37 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: On Jerks and Social Responsibility
“Suppose
hypothetically that one out of every 200 people or so is a jerk. In
today's world these jerks will discover that if they enter government
or business they can become super rich and powerful jerks. Do we
conclude, therefore, that markets (or government) have caused greed?
No, the fact is that once we no longer live in tiny tribes of 200,
anonymity allows some people, who would have been assholes in a small
tribe but who would have been sanctioned there, to go off and become
jerks on a much, much larger scale.
“Technology,
including Zaadz, will allow us to evade the jerks far more than we
could before. The technology-based social responsibility movement,
broadly construed, will allow us to return to some extent to the moral
monitoring of small villages.”
Source: zPod:FLOW:Re: Forget the World Bank, Try Wal-Mart
August 30, 2006 at 02:37 AM in COAT4D, Zaadz | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: What Zaadz Is and Then Some...
(Crossposted from ~C4Chaos@Zaadz.com)
On a rainy, overcast, and cold Thursday morning, while the UK is on critical alert due to terrorist threats, I felt the need to remind myself why I'm working at Zaadz. I believe that what we're doing here is worthwhile in the grand scheme of things…
(via zQuotes tagged with "zaadz")
First of all, I just want to make a distinction about who zaadz is
serving. When we first came up with the idea for zaadz, we talked about
creating a community for 'spiritual' people. Unfortunately, the word
'spiritual' normally conjures up a vision of groups of monks sitting in
silent meditation or perhaps… a bunch of idealistic vegans.
Our
big realization is that 'spiritual' doesn't have to be put into a box
(or a silo). We believe that spirituality is about following your
soul's purpose, whether that's about doing yoga, spinning poi or
creating the next big thing on the web.
Source: Aeon's Blog: Towards an Integral Zaadz
But
I don't see Zaadz as a place with a single motive for its members - I
think that we want to enable people of like minds (whether those minds
be yogic, Buddhist, self-improvement-oriented) to congregate,
communicate and cooperate, to create an atmosphere of wellness, support
and abundance for ourselves and our members, and for ourselves - the
wizards - to do so in a sustainable way that supports our own
livelihoods.
Source: Jake (ジャコブ)'s Blog: Sunyata
We
want to be part of people's lives. People who want to live a life of
health and sustainability. We want our members to learn from each
other. We want our members to have various opinions. We want debate. We
want encouragement. We want community.
We are not here to provide a platform for meaninglessness. We want people to come here for inspiration.
Source: :franc's Blog: So what up with all this positive communication?
I strongly believe that nothing is more spiritual than living at our
highest potential while serving others. I believe that the more closely
aligned we are to “spirit” the more fully we will give ourselves in
service to the world. As such, my “spiritual path” is the path that
leads me to a more complete manifestation of my unique Bodhisattvic
duties.
August 10, 2006 at 02:17 AM in COAT4D, Kosmic Aperture, Web/Tech, Xistential Memoir, Zaadz, ~Reticulum Rex | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: Visionaries
Anyone who has
ever accomplished anything of importance - especially to the benefit of
others - has had to endure being misunderstood by those who just
couldn't get it.
There
are some people who are actually driven by something much greater than
self-absorption. These people have an Urge on the inside of them that
haunts and compels them to make their Urge a reality.
Source: An Open Letter to Visionaries, via zPod:Vision Cafe – http://pods.zaadz.com/power
August 9, 2006 at 04:39 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: On Work
The work of a
person laboring in some humble occupation is no less relevant to the
well-being of society than that of, for example, a doctor, a teacher, a
monk, or a nun. All human endeavor is potentially great and noble. So
long as we carry out our work with good motivation, thinking, “My work
is for others,” it will be of benefit to the wider community. But when
concern for others' feelings and welfare is missing, our activities
tend to become spoiled. Through lack of basic human feeling, religion,
politics, economics, and so on can be rendered dirty. Instead of
serving humanity, they become agents of destruction.
Source: Ethics for the New Millennium: His Holiness the Dalai Lama, Page: 174
August 8, 2006 at 02:41 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: Getting Hot in Herre
I'm sure a lot of people in the U.S. right now are thinking about global warming due to the current heat wave. That's understandable because it's really freakin' HOT out there! Good thing I'm in Ireland right now where it's mostly chilly and rainy.
In the meantime, let me add more wood into the fire with today's COAT :) Drink lotsa water y'all! And check out zPod:CLIMATE CHANGE!
I am not arguing that global warming is the same as eugenics. But the
similarities are not superficial. And I do claim that open and frank
discussion of the data, and of the issues, is being suppressed. Leading
scientific journals have taken strong editorial positions of the side
of global warming, which, I argue, they have no business doing. Under
the circumstances, any scientist who has doubts understands clearly
that they will be wise to mute their expression.
One
proof of this suppression is the fact that so many of the outspoken
critics of global warming are retired professors. These individuals are
not longer seeking grants, and no longer have to face colleagues whose
grant applications and career advancement may be jeopardized by their
criticisms.
Source: State of Fear, Page: APPENDIX I
August 3, 2006 at 03:13 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: Michio Kaku Rocks!
Scientists
willing to risk their reputations on higher dimensions soon found
themselves ridiculed by the scientific community. Higher-dimensional
space became the last refuge for mystics, cranks, and charlatans.
Source: Hyperspace : A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimens ion , Page: 23
“Did
God have a mother?” Children, when told that God made the heavens and
the earth, innocently ask whether God had a mother. This deceptively
simple question has stumped the elders of the church and embarrassed
the finest theologians, precipitating some of the thorniest theological
debates over the centuries. All the great religions have elaborate
mythologies surrounding the divine act of Creation, but none of them
adequately confronts the logical paradoxes inherent in the question
that even children ask.
Source: Hyperspace : A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimens ion , Page: 191
Some
people seek meaning in life through personal gain, through personal
relationship, or through personal experiences. However, it seems to me
that being blessed with the intellect to divine the ultimate secrets of
nature gives meaning enough to life.
Source: Hyperspace : A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimens ion , Page: 334
August 2, 2006 at 01:27 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: Crazy Little Thing Called Love
I define love thus: The will to extend one's self for the purpose of nurturing one's own or another's spiritual growth.
through your lifetime
by the inner learning creature,
the playful spiritual being
that is your real self.
Don't turn away
from possible futures
before you're certain you don't have
anything to learn from them.
You're always free to change your mind and
choose a different future, or
a different
past.
In a world full of people there's only some want to fly
Isn't that crazy
Isn't that crazy Isn't that crazy Isn't that crazy
Seal, “Crazy” via http://www.last.fm/music/Seal/_/Crazy
August 1, 2006 at 03:02 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: On Death and IPOs
A few years ago you could make an interesting distinction who thought there was something special about the Internet and those who saw it as no big deal. Now of course everybody sees it as a big deal mostly because of those weirdball IPOs and the overnight billionnaires they spawned. But I think the distinction is still valid. Most companies with Net-dollar-signs in their eyes today are still missing the “something special” dimension.
July 31, 2006 at 03:21 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
COAT4D: On Integration
“Fulfilling the four needs [spiritual, mental, physical, social] in an integrated way is like combining elements in chemistry. When we reach a “critical mass” of integration, we experience spontaneous combustion–an explosion of inner synergy that ignites the fire within and gives vision, passion, and a spirit of adventure to life.”
July 29, 2006 at 02:30 AM in COAT4D | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
















