~C4Chaos

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Fairness

Scott Adams asks:

---

"I was thinking of fairness the other day when considering my next car purchase. I figure I need to do my part to conserve energy. I considered buying a fuel-efficient car that would give me no joy whatsoever. It’s the fair thing to do. We all need to pitch in.

"Then I remembered I’ve never procreated. That’s a huge energy savings. When you create new humans, they start leaving the lights on, driving, eating, pooping, and doing all sorts of energy-inefficient things. By not creating any new humans, I’m saving a huge amount of energy!

"I walk to work. That saves a lot of fuel too. If you consider my total energy drain on the planet, I could own a small fleet of gas-guzzlers and still be greener than 95% of the citizens of the United States. That seems fair to me.

"If you were the judge in this decision, and considered all the facts, would you give me a Hummer?"

There goes Uncle Scott again stirring the Green-pot. It's still Earth Week so I just couldn't resist. So I went ahead and left this comment.

---

of course you are entitled to buy what you want. i think you're a reasonable guy, Scott and you'd consider your values to reflect your purchase purchase to reflect your values. same way you choose to be vegetarian.

but imho, if i have your money, i'll have more joy riding this:
http://www.lexus.com/hybriddrive/

or, if i really want to show off, i'd buy this:
http://www.teslamotors.com/

instead of this piece of crap :)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/caterina/9447686/

my two cents.

~C

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Nostrildumbass Does it Again

After a short hiatus, the Dilbert Blog Troll is back! I missed you Uncle Scott! I know you missed me too. LOL. So I'll be resuming my trolling on the The Dilbert Blog... Hey, look! This is a neat topic!

---

The Dilbert Blog: Nostrildumbass Does it Again

In my book, THE RELIGION WAR, I predicted that terrorists would start using GPS-guided drones (model-sized unmanned airplanes) to bomb stuff from a distance. It just makes sense. The technology exists and it doesn’t cost that much. You can launch a drone from anywhere and make it fly precisely to anywhere else.

---

And here's what the ~DBT has to say:

WOOT! interesting book and premise Uncle Scott.

"Adams says The Religion War targets "bright readers with short attention spans-everyone from lazy students to busy book clubs.""

yep, that's me! LOL. so i added it to my reading list. http://coolmel.zaadz.com/books/lists/bookshelf

speaking of religion and wars, i think Richard Dawkins made a fool of himself by engaging the religious fanatics into "word wars." Mr. Dawkins seems to have forgotten the stages of moral development.

http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/07/exteriors_and_i.html

so, Scott, i hope you didn't forget that part in your book!

~C (for Christianity is at war with itself)

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Could Science Eliminate Religion

Serendipity is flowing in the deep surface of the blogosphere. Check this out.

---

The Dilbert Blog: Could Science Eliminate Religion?

"As readers of my blog know, I believe that given the right conditions, anyone can be made to believe any damned thing. That’s why there are so many different religions.

Persuasion has many names and forms.

Advertising
Indoctrination
Peer pressure
Hypnosis
Brainwashing

I wonder if a team of well-funded atheists could devise a legal and ethical method of reducing people’s religious faith. It would probably require testing lots of different methods until you found out what cocktail of messages worked best, but I think it would work." [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say:

LOL. what a cool experiment. what you just described there is exposing people to spiraling levels of consciousness / worldviews

i say it could work but good luck. there are tons of people who are already doing this.

http://integralinstitute.org/approach.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_Dynamics#Overview

but the effect is still a little slow. but maybe if you sneak these concepts in your comic strips then you could get their point across much faster. because Scott Adams, make that Dogbert, is a great influencer.

if this doesn't work, then you can always create your own religion in 10 easy steps:
http://integral-options.zaadz.com/blog/2006/5/create_your_own_religion_in_10_easy_steps

but to answer your original question whether Science could eliminate Religion, i say it couldn't. because it's like replacing one partial truth with another partial truth, especially when Science is also a religion to most scientific flatland thinking moronic lemon-eating aggressor animals.

but at least Science can end blind faith:
http://deepsurface.net/2006/05/25/sam-harris/

that is all. i'm off to watch X-Men: The Last Stand. that is more interesting than this boring topic. LOL.

~C4無秩序

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Let's Get Rich(er)

Man, that evil Scott Adams has been using his minions of lemon eaters and aggressor animals to fatten up his stock portfolio! But the ~DBT could see through his evil scheming! That no-good Scott is using the Wisdom of Crowds to his advantage!

---

The Dilbert Blog: Let's Get Rich(er)

"I wonder what would happen if we used our collective Dilbert-Blog-Reader brain to come up with stock investment tips. Let’s find out.

I don’t believe it’s wise to pick individual stocks based on factors such as the quality of management, quality of products, or projected cash flow. First, those things are unknowable because the information is filtered through known liars. Second, those factors are generally overwhelmed by luck, either good or bad." [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say:

"I contend that the best way to pick stocks that will be big winners is to identify global trends before other people notice, and buy stocks in the companies that will benefit from those trends no matter how poorly they are managed."

AHA!!!! i can see right through you, Scott! i think you've read the Wisdom of Crowds,

http://www.randomhouse.com/features/wisdomofcrowds/

and you're using your minions of lemon eaters and aggressor animals to pick the winning stocks for you! you are soooo evil! but i like it ;)

~C4無秩序

P.S. speaking of Wisdom of Crowds, here's a crowd chant for you!
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/04/wisdom_of_crowd.html

---

Here's a proof that crowds got wisdom! The Dilbert Portfolio is up!!!

The Dilbert Blog: Dilbert Portolio (up by 3% in one day)

The Dilbert Blog: Dilbert Portfolio Update (up by 7% in 2 days)

If this trend continues, maybe Scott could afford to give up those stupid pop up ads on his blog site. Why? Because POPUP ADS SUCK A$$ BIG TIME!!!

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Gender Pay Disparity

Well, well, well, Scott is now playing the gender game (he's actually helping someone do their research). So here's the ~DBT giving him and his minions of lemon eaters a deadly Wilber-Deida-Leykis Matrix 3-2-1, up, up, down, down, triangle, square, select, start combo. LOL.

---

The Dilbert Blog: Gender Pay Disparity

"...I read somewhere (and as usual I forget where) that men are more likely to negotiate for a higher salary than women. All other things being equal, the person who negotiates for more money is more likely to get it.

Also, studies show that the tallest person is usually paid the most. Men are taller than women. So there might be some heightism as well as sexism. I’ve noticed that the women who make it to executive positions seem taller than average." [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say:

excellent points. cool research. i like your take too on it Scott. that is so true. men are more willing to take risks and go for independence. however, this not merely a sex thing.

let me add another perspective on your sexist minds. you see, it's more on the "type" e.g. masculine and feminine as opposed to just sex. feel free to call it typism if you feel like it.

masculine types (or in general, males) tend to be more "agentic," meaning they seek independence and more adventurous (read: more logical, less intuitive)

feminine types (or in general, females) tend to be more "communal," meaning they seek community, connecting with other people, more on feelings, rather than just using their heads (read: more intuitive, less logical).

if we use "typism" rather than "sexism" then it would be a little more accurate. why? because typism crosses the boundaries of sexism. how? well, both male and female can exhibit both types at the same time and depending on the situation. e.g. there are men who's femininity is more dominant than their masculinity (read: gays, or effeminate men), there are women who's masculinity is more dominant than their feminity (e.g. gays, lesbians, female CEOs).

so there. this are just the basics of course. for more on typology, look up David Deida,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Deida

and Ken Wilber's AQAL,
http://www.kenwilber.com

or better yet, listen Tom Leykis ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Leykis

my two cents.

~C4無秩序

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Debating People Who are Bad at Math

Well, it looks like the ~DBT got censored again on The Dilbert Blog. I'm not sure if it was just an oversight on Scott's part. Maybe the ~DBT got into his nerves again. Or maybe Scott doesn't like Transcendental Meditation or he couldn't put his fluffy head around Integral Mathematics. Regardless, I'm posting it here for posterity. It's their loss.

---

The Dilbert Blog: Debating People Who are Bad at Math

"I remember years ago when the “three strikes” law was being debated in California. For you out-of-towners, the proposed law would put repeat criminals (those convicted three times) in jail for exceptionally long sentences. The statistics showed that the repeat offenders committed a huge chunk of the overall crimes.

Here’s the funny part. Many people argued that jailing the people who commit repeat crimes would have no impact on the crime rate. I guess they figured that non-criminals would sense the void and jump in and keep that crime rate high." [ read more ]

---

here's the censored comment by the ~DBT:

hmmm. i think you're missing the point, Scott (or you just didn't mention your position because you want to draw out the stupid lemon eaters and aggressor animals), when it comes to incarceration. the deepr issues here are the stupid lame-ass clueless stupid ancient methods of rehabilitation adhered to by the government (and society as a whole).

IMIO (in my ignorant opinion), instead of just providing "criminals" with gym equipments (that will make them buff and more powerful and meaner) and lousy prison food, why not rehabilitate them in the true sense of the word. one method is through personal development through meditation:

http://www.tm.org/research/summary.html

if the research holds up then the three strikes law will not be as necessary.

i say leave North Korea alone, well at least publicly. those CIA guys can continue their clandestine operations just to make sure we've got our asses covered.

as for your math, it sucks. very simplistic. i say try Integral Mathematics and let's see how tough you are.

http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/kosmos/excerptC/appendix-B.cfm

my two cents.

~C4無秩序

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: The Oil Theory of Iraq

Scott is playing that "Iraq war due to oil" card again. Unfortunately, the ~DBT is too ignorant on the subject to have a useful opinion. However, reading through the comment section, a lot of opinions are very plausible. I knew it! Some readers of the Dilbert Blog are not that stupid, except for that BBC dude, because I swear, that guy really freaks me out!

So yeah, IMIO (in my ignorant opinion), oil is indeed one of the main reasons for going to war when viewed from a socio-political and economic beer-goggles. But when viewed from a much higher vantage point, I think Ken Wilber's assessment is very fluffy.

---

The Dilbert Blog: The Oil Theory of Iraq

"I don't understand the theory that we attacked Iraq for oil. Can one of you geniuses explain that to the rest of us?

I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next person. And I certainly think governments are capable of doing bad things. But I don’t understand the concept of attacking Iraq "because of oil." What does that even mean?" [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say. like i said, ignorant.

um, since i subscribe to the philosophy of Ignorantselfishsingularitarianism,
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/03/ignorantselfish.html

and i don't have enough knowledge to make an informed opinion, i'll just shut the hell up and link to stuff that can shed a little light on this.
http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/misc/iraq.cfm

and i will definitely enjoy reading all the stupid lemon eating and animal aggressor opinions here. lol.

~C4無秩序

---

like i said, some Dilbert Blog trolls are not that stupid. case in point: Cochrane.

Cochrane said: "This is a comment about the comments, not about the reason for war. The real reason for the war will hardly be known until historicians get access to the relevant archives, which might be in 50 years, give or take a few.

One thing I noticed is how harmful misunderstanding of history can be. Many people just say "Oh, that's like ...., exactly the same", here the example one can see the most often is colonialism. This example shows clearly that the one giving it did not understand colonialism. The idea behind colonialism was to get access to new markets, not new ressources. "America went to war for oil" is the exact opposite and yet people easily connect this. Those people likely think that they understand history, although they only understand part of it...."

read more. coz it gets better!

The Dilbert Blog Troll: IQ and Religion Again + Psychics and God

Scott is really persistent on the correlation between IQ and religion. Again, the ~DBT couldn't resist but to give a piece of its Big Mind to Scott and his minions or lemon eaters and aggressor animals who by now are starting to get bored with this topic.

---

The Dilbert Blog: IQ and Religion

"Some of you questioned my so-called fact that religious faith is correlated with lower education and intelligence. It’s appropriate to question those sorts of statistics since it’s entirely possible that the studies were done by atheist-leaning weasels. I would go so far as to say probable." [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say. with minor corrections on some grammar.

you don't need no freakin' scientific papers to understand that there is indeed a correlation between low IQ and religiousity. BOCTAOE. and take note that we're talking about "religiousity" here and NOT spirituality. those are two different beasts. the problem is when people confuse the two.
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/141/story_14148_1.html

while we're at it, forget about IQ tests, try looking at it from a much higher vantage point. you'll notice that most developing countries who are "deeply religious" (e.g. third-world Catholic countries, Christian-influenced Africa, etc.) tend to be on the poor side of the basic needs scale. now what does that tell you?

anyway, as per Scott's dumbass points:

#1. yep. this is true in a sense. Maslow's hierarchy is a hierarchy for a reason.
http://www.omidyar.net/group/community-general/news/574/

#2. yep, this is also true in a sense. a lot of college professors are closeted atheists, IMHO.

#3. this is true also. that's why if you want to notice the "subtleties of the Divine" then the academia is last place you should look for it.

#4. some of them are. i bet the Rain Man would smoke every one here when it comes to IQ tests. just kidding.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot_savant

my point: intelligence is NOT a single line of development! there are multiple intelligences. look up Howard Gardner's work.
http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm
http://coolmel.typepad.com/project_trinity/2003/11/spaghetti_intel.html

"My next blog will be on Occam’s Razor. Stay tuned."

whotf cares about Occam's Razor? are you going the "Contact" route again? ala Carl Sagan who reduces the mystery of the Cosmos into the physical domain? (God bless his intelligent soul) please, you're more intelligent than this Scott! jeesh!

~C4無秩序

---

as a bonus, here's what the ~DBT has to say on the topic of Psychics and God. minor corrections on spelling.

More Excellent than Scott's Dumbass Categorization

1) some people are more intelligent than Scott and can see through his evil scheming.
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/04/the_dilbert_blo_11.html

2) some people have a bigger yet more inclusive definition of God than Scott's overly simplistic bullshit filter.
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/153/story_15318_1.html

3) ditto on "William Shatner created the universe."
http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2006/04/psychics_and_go.html#comment-16497703

lol.

~C4無秩序

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Edgar Cayce

WTF is this? Scott is now dissing one of the ~DBT's most favorite psychics? Scott can diss education and religion, the Koran, Christianity, and even God, but he's gone too far by dissing dear Edgar Cayce! This cannot be! Edgar Cayce taught the ~DBT more compassion and critical thinking than all those stupid Bible-thumping idiots put together. So in honor of the late great psychic the ~DBT again pooped all over the land of the Dilbert Blog.

---

The Dilbert Blog: Edgar Cayce

"I just saw a TV show about famous alleged psychic Edgar Cayce. Back in the 1920s he was putting himself into trances and making lots of predictions that – according to this program – turned out to be true. One prominent example they gave is that he predicted the exact year of the depression. Then the show mentioned that Cayce’s lifelong dream was to start a hospital, which he accomplished. Unfortunately it quickly went out of business because he started it around the same time as . . . the depression" [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say. check it out since the ~DBT has managed to pimp Edgar Cayce, Ken Wilber, the Singularity, Zaadz, and even the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster with relevant Zen-like prowess! LOL.

Psychics = yes; then talk to this guy:
http://jeff.zaadz.com/blog

God = yes; but depends on which level of God you believe in:
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/153/story_15318_1.html

i predict that Technological Singularity will happen in 2045.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity

Cayce rocks!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce

and so is The Dilbert Blog (Troll) lol.
http://ma.gnolia.com/people/coolmel/tags/~DBT

whatever. i say who wants to know about the future when you don't even know who you are?

~C4無秩序

---

P.S. you can diss Edgar Cayce and other psychics as much as you want, Scott, due to your partial ignorance. but here's my prediction: you will soon feel the heat of my WRATH if you don't remove those STUPID POPUP ADS on The Dilbert Blog! Why? Because POPUP ADS SUCK A$$ BIG TIME!!!!

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Education and Religion

Education and religion are topics that are close to the heart of the Dilbert Blog Troll. So when The Dark Fluffy Overlord (aka Scott Adams) brought up this topic on the land of The Dilbert Blog, the ~DBT had no choice but to poop all over that dimension and leave crap on the heads of minions of stupid lemon eaters and aggressor animals. Unfortunately, the Dark Fluffy Overlord censored (or overlooked) the meaty poop that the ~DBT crapped on his land. So the crap will be posted on this crappy blog here instead.

---

The Dilbert Blog: Education and Religion

"This will look like a rhetorical question, but it’s not. I’m still trying to figure out how religious people interpret their environment. Here’s something that has always puzzled me.

You’ve probably seen the studies showing that the smarter you are, and the more you know, the less likely you are religious. The studies are usually expressed in terms of education. High school dropouts are more religious than people who finished graduate school, etc." [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT said. it didn't get posted maybe because it offended the puny ego of the Dark Fluffy Overlord or maybe he just missed it due to the tons of poop he got from his minions of lemon eaters and aggressor animal orges.

man, Scott, my boy, you are smokin'! at least you're not as boring now as you used to be. so here i am again giving you a minute piece of my Big Mind so that you and your legions of lemon eaters and aggressor animals could understand "stuff."

"Under my special powers of interrogation, the extra-smart religious people almost always admit (privately) that their religion is more of a choice than a perception. In other words, for the extra-smart, the concept of God exists, and that concept benefits their lives, independent of any literal truth. It’s a lot like being an atheist while keeping the benefits of being religious. That’s exactly the sort of extra-smart solution you would expect from extra-smart people."

nice. i admire you for this observation because i think you've just described ME! LOL. i won't bore you with details of my uber-smartness because i don't think even you can handle it. just follow this link and you decide:
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/04/red_c_diary_im_.html

and here are my answers to all your partial points:

#1. people who think this are idiots!

#2. there is some truth to this. like Shakespeare said,
"There are more things in heaven and earth... than are dreamt of in your philosophy."

#3. people who think this are idiots!

#4. people who think this are honest and are on their way to GROW up.

#5. people who think this could use some more education.

"Can the believers among you tell me if I left anything off the list?"

again! YOU MISSED THE BIGGER PICTURE!!!! why do you keep on doing this, Scott? jeesh! you are starting to disappoint me. i've already told you yesterday to brush up on social development theories, like Spiral Dynamics and other models,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_Dynamics

yet you keep on stirring things like this. so ok, if Spiral Dynamics is too complicated for you, i'll just tell you to go back to the basics and brush up on your Maslow's Hierarchy.
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2005/08/eat_the_rich_ch.html

that is all for now. i need to make some decaffeinated tea because your (and your stupid lemon eating and aggressor animals) toxic thinking is killing me!

~C4無秩序

---

however, some of the antagonistic poop by the ~DBT got posted. this kinda fishy.

~DBT pooping on Ric White; Ric White's ego got hurt; ~DBT pooping again on Ric White

~DBT pooping on Sunny coz Sunny pooped on the Mormons

This is the most fun topic on The Dilbert Blog (yet)ever!

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: 4 Billion Losers

Ok. Scott really asked for it. So the ~DBT gave him and his minions of lemon eaters and aggressor animals a dose of Spiral Dynamics.

---

The Dilbert Blog: 4 Billion Losers

"Recently I asked the believers among you to explain why you believe in your own prophet but not the other guy’s prophet. The LDS (Mormon) folks said they talk directly to God and get personal answers. Most of the rest of you said something along the lines that your prophet(s) (or Christ) told you that the other guy’s prophet(s) (or Christ) isn’t all that. Fair enough. I was concerned that you hadn’t thought it through.

Now I have another question for the believers. And by the way, I’m genuinely curious. I don’t do this just to stir up things, although that’s fun too. I actually wonder how you think. My question is this: How do you explain to yourself that 4 billion people (minimum) believe different from you?" [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say:

ok, Scott, i will again entertain your curious musings because i have nothing better to do during my coffee break. and besides, the friggin' coffee machine is broken again. phujackshiksukitalltohell!

#1. TRUE

#2. yes, similar, but not the same. meaning that all religions are partially true. but when you do a ranking on them, that's the time you notice that some religions SUCK MORE than others. the ranking of course will depend upon one's SUCKY MENTALITY.

#3. sooo TRUE.

#4. WTF is this? this thinking is sooo Middle Ages. i think you're better off playing LOTR Online.
http://lotro.turbine.com/

#5. WTF is this? this is sooo elitist and Middle Ages. only hole-poopers (and their brainwashed lemmings) think like this.

"What did I miss?"

ahhh, Scott, my man, YOU ARE MISSING THE BIG PICTURE just like the rest of your minions of lemon eaters and aggressor animals here. do us a favor and do more research on social development. but like i said, the social development theory Spiral Dynamics gives a good answer to your musings. so check it out before you open your big mouth again!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_Dynamics
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2005/01/spiral_dynamics.html

stupid lemon eaters and aggressor animals, GROW the hell up! lol.

that is all (for now).

~C4無秩序

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Koran Translations

WTF?! There goes Scott again with his big balls! Now he's duking it out with the Koran. And of course, the ~DBT has some witty things to say about this topic. But I digress. If there's any fluffy Muslims out there reading this, show The Dilbert Blog and its minions of lemon eaters and aggressor animals your Fluffy Love!

---

The Dilbert Blog: Koran Translations

"Soon after 9/11 I decided to read the Koran to see what would inspire believers to pilot a jet into a building. I picked up an English translation and dove in.

My impression of this translated version was that it was stuffed with warlike language about killing the Christians and Jews and infidels whenever they are on your land or otherwise threatening you. I’m no religious scholar (perhaps you’ve noticed) but my reading of the Koran seemed to clearly support Osama’s interpretation. The equation was simple: Christians and Jews were on Muslim land, and the Koran seemed to clearly and repeatedly say that killing them was not only allowed but strongly encouraged." [ read more ]

---

here's what the ~DBT has to say:

man. Scott! what veggies have you been eating these past few days that made your BALLS grow BIG?!

your balls may be big, Scott. but your balls will never be bigger than this Arab-American woman. hah!
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/03/wafa_sultan_giv.html

my pick is #2 and #3

but i say, screw translated books! you're better off with channeling! LOL.
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2004/02/7even_days_chri.html

that is all (for now).

~C4無秩序

---

and here's another ~DBT rant:

Anonymous Muslim-Atheist (aka AMA) said: "And before you think me a muslim masquerading as an atheist, keep in mind that I cannot tell my family that I am no longer a muslim as the punishment for that is a nice weekend beheading. So, I'm more of an atheist masquerading as a muslim. ;)"

nice. i bow to you AMA. you make me think and laugh. you rock the house! stupid lemon eating and aggressor animals (including me) who don't know anything about Islam yet keep on yapping, shut the hell up! lol.

~C4無秩序

---

P.S. you may be ballsy, Scott, but I said it before, and I will say it again!
POPUP ADS SUCK A$$ BIG TIME!!!

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Non Prophet Organization

Man, Scott's BIG compassionate balls are still uber-flowing. Check out the latest post on The Dilbert Blog. And of course, the ~DBT can't help but comment on these ballsy things!

---

The Dilbert Blog: Non Prophet Organization
"I've always been curious about how a person can believe that God spoke to Moses and not become a Muslim. Allow me to explain my confusion.

For those who are not up to speed on your comparative religion, let me oversimplify it for you. Jews believe Moses communicated with God and that Jesus was a prophet. Christians believe that Moses communicated with God, plus Jesus is the son of God (or God himself). Muslims believe in Moses and Jesus (as human prophets) plus Mohammed." [ read more ]

---

and here's what the ~DBT has to say:

ok, Scott. i bow to your balls really. this is good stuff. i'm a non-believer on Prophets but i will comment nonetheless so i can give my piece of Big Mind to the rest or your lemon eating and aggressor animal believers, including those who believe that Dilbert and You are gods.

first off, let me say comparative religion is groovy but it can only take you so far. try comparative mysticism. here's a google search for those lazy believers:
http://www.google.com/search?&q=mysticism+in+world+religions

once you're done comparing religion and mysticism, then get back to reality and understand how people and society develop their ethics, morals, spirituality, etc... there are various models of development out there but i particularly find Spiral Dynamics to be more inclusive:
http://www.spiraldynamics.org/Graves/colors.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_Dynamics
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2005/01/spiral_dynamics.html

once you're done with those, you'll still be an a-hole. but at least, you'll be a more compassionate and a more inclusive a-hole than you used to be.

my two freakin' cents.

~C4無秩序

---

and here's another:

Nancy Reyes said: "For Catholics, it's easy. Jesus isn't a prophet, he is God (part 2)."

that stupid comment is what gets us into trouble. by that statement you assumed that all Catholics think like you do. you see, i still am technically a Catholic, and like you I live in the Philippines too.
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/04/red_c_diary_im_.html

our difference is our way of thinking. so i suggest that next time, to be more compassionate with Catholics and non-Catholics alike. so try qualifying generalizations like these with "most."

let me rephrase your statement with: "For most stupid Catholics, it's easy. Jesus isn't a prophet, he is God (part 2)."

there. that's better.

if you were just joking, then please disregard this, because i was just kidding too. lol!

~C4無秩序

---

The Dilbert Blog Troll is sooo evil! LOL.

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Easter Troll

Who needs the lame Easter Bunny when you've got the Easter Troll? Whatever. I knew it! Scott is a closeted Christian too. LOL. Slacker. But never falter, the ~DBT is here to aggregate the ballsy posts from the Dilbert Blog in the past couple days, including the ~DBT comments of course. Observe!

---

The Dilbert Blog: Uh-Oh
"I’m reading a fascinating new book called Misquoting Jesus, by Bart Ehrman. The author is an expert at looking at ancient documents, especially biblical stuff, and figuring out what’s original work and what got altered by subsequent scribes. Apparently there are a lot of experts in that field." [ read more ]

---

See the ~DBT wise-ass comment. Also check out the comment of a troll named Brondu.

---

The Dilbert Blog: Respecting the Belief of Others
"People keep telling me that I should respect the beliefs of others. That sounds entirely reasonable, at least until you think about it. The problem is in knowing where to draw the line. I can understand why, for example, Presbyterians should respect the beliefs of Methodists. They’re practically the same thing." [ read more ]

---

See the ~DBT long-ass comment. Also check out the comment of a troll named Brondu.

---

There. Happy Easter from the Dilbert Blog Troll!

~The Dilbert Blog Troll: Helpful Critical Guy Syndrome

Sssssomebody sssstop meh! What can I do if Scott keeps posting relevant stuff that The Dilbert Blog Troll can surf onto? Observe!

---

The Dilbert Blog: Helpful Critical Guy Syndrome

"Over the past 15 years I have received amongst my bit-piles of appreciative fan e-mail.... 100% of these e-mails are from males who seem – based on their well-written letters – above average in intelligence. That’s 780 nearly identical messages from men, and zero of this type from women. I call it the Helpful Critical Guy Syndrome, HCGS for short.... Imagine you are giving some important advice to President Bush about a world problem of your choice. You have a maximum of two sentences to sum up your argument in an unforgettable and folksy way. Example: 'Remember, Mr. President, you can’t kill an idea, but an idea can kill you.'"

---

HCGS. i like that. i've been like that to you but you're not paying attention, Scott. you still remain smug in playing Dark Fluffy Overlord in your underpants. see? http://coolmel.zaadz.com/blog/2006/4/free_will_destiny_and_crap_in_the_land_of_the_dilbert_blog

anyway, to entertain your musings again...

"Imagine you are giving some important advice to President Bush about a world problem of your choice. You have a maximum of two sentences to sum up your argument in an unforgettable and folksy way."

get rid of your Dick Cheney and your stupid advisors, so you can grow some balls.

leave Iran alone and let's just watch Peaceful Warrior the movie coz it's going to be a classic. http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2006/04/peaceful_warrio.html

~C4無秩序

---

P.S. I think the Dark Fluffy Overlord got tired and overwhelmed by the avalanche of lemon eaters and aggressor animals on his Free Will (part 2) Koanic Fallacy. Whatever, Scott. The saga will continue in the land of Zaadz. Meantime, you remain silent and smug on my question to you, Scott --

man, Scott! hello?! you can stop quoting these stupid quantum BS-filters and sh*t. they are symbols in a never-ending sliding chains of signifiers for "reality." but if you want some groovy answers, i say lookup the singularity:
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2005/10/welcome_to_the_.html

but YOU (and your legions of lemon eaters and aggressor animals) still haven't answered my question:

does free will and evolution exist in DEEP DREAMLESS SLEEP?

i think i know your answer because i've read God's Debris fer Chrissakes! so stop playing like an idiot! duh?!
http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/2005/12/mythic_god_sant.html

~C4無秩序

---

P.P.S. Speaking of HCGS, I'll say this again, Scott, for your own good:

POPUP ADS SUCK A$$ BIG TIME!!!

if you don't believe The Dilbert Blog Troll, at least heed the wisdom of the gods of Firefox fer Chrissakes!!!